IBM i Storage and DASD Hardware

Is internal DASD expansion or external SAN attachment the better choice?

Internal DASD expansion is usually simpler and cheaper if the goal is just more disk pool capacity on one server. External SAN attachment makes more sense when a business wants to consolidate storage management across IBM i and other platforms on shared infrastructure.

Answer

Internal DASD expansion is usually simpler and cheaper if the goal is just more disk pool capacity on one server. External SAN attachment makes more sense when a business wants to consolidate storage management across IBM i and other platforms on shared infrastructure.

SAN attachment adds implementation complexity, including adapter compatibility and multipathing configuration, so it should be chosen for a real consolidation or centralization goal, not simply because it sounds more modern.

Back to IBM i Storage and DASD Hardware